Topic: Voice Pro or Voice Live2 has better algorithm for harmonies ?

Hello and happy new year

I am a customer and I have buy until now :

1. Voice Works Plus
2. VoiceTone Harmony-G XT
3. TC PowerCore MKII

I need your help for my next purchase, so here is a couple of questions :

1.  If the excellent reverb "Super Natural" (from Voice Works) is the same at 
A.   Voice Pro 
B.   Voice Live2
or there is some other algorithm in any of them (better or different)

2.  Witch one has better algorithm for voice harmonies ?  Voice Pro or Voice Live2 ?
I know, Voice Pro  has AES/EBU and that is great.
But I need one (not 2,3, or 4) voice harmony and I remember Voice Work Plus was slow and strange at sibilancy (s, x and f. 
Very strange when there were two ''F'' in the same word)

So  I would like to know, if there is fast algorithm at Voice Pro like today's generation VoiceLIve2.
Or I should buy VoiceLIve2

Witch one you suggest for one voice harmony, studio recording ?
(Recorded voice out --to-- Helicon and Hellicon --out- to sound card)

Thank you in advance

Re: Voice Pro or Voice Live2 has better algorithm for harmonies ?

for recording voicelive touch and voicelive 2 are poor at best get yourself an apogee duet 2 instead

Re: Voice Pro or Voice Live2 has better algorithm for harmonies ?

duff2011 wrote:

for recording voicelive touch and voicelive 2 are poor at best get yourself an apogee duet 2 instead


I don't understand that statement.

The OP was asking about harmonies and you'll have a hard time getting an apogee to give you some harmonies.



I use a VL2 on a digital loop in cubase and it works just great for recording.


Voice pro is discontinued, if you have a good deal on a used one that might be an option. $3k is a lot!
Voice live Rack might be a way to go because it is built as a studio tool.

Re: Voice Pro or Voice Live2 has better algorithm for harmonies ?

duff2011 wrote:

for recording voicelive touch and voicelive 2 are poor at best get yourself an apogee duet 2 instead

I don't understand that comment, please explain.